Handels-og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss

Danfoss
Submitted 05 April 1988
Decided 17 October 1989
Full case nameHandels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss
Case109/88
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1989:383
ChamberFull court
Nationality of partiesDenmark
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
R. Joliet
President
O. Due
Judges
Advocate General
C. O. Lenz
Keywords
Equality, pay

Handels-og Kontorfunktionaerernes Forbund I Danmark v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Danfoss (1989) C-109/88 is an EU labour law case, which held that if an employer is to justify indirect discrimination, measures taken must be directly related to being able to do the job.

Facts

Pay in the workplace was set according to adaptability, training and seniority. The effect was that women were paid less.

Judgment

ECJ held that adaptability to variable hours, place of work or training was justifiable only if these criteria were ‘of importance for the performance of specific tasks entrusted to the employee’. However, it also added that, ‘length of service goes hand in hand with experience and since experience generally enables the employee to perform his duties better, the employer is free to reward it without having to establish the importance it has in the performance of specific tasks entrusted to the employee’.

See also

  • v
  • t
  • e
EU equality sources
TFEU art 157
Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976)
Handels-og KF v Danfoss (1989)
Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange (1990) Case 262/88
R (Seymour-Smith) v SS for Employment (1999)
Mangold v Helm (2005)
Directive 2006/54/EC
Directive 2000/43/EC
Directive 2000/78/EC
See EU law
  • v
  • t
  • e
Sources on justifying discrimination
Equality Act 2010 Sch 9
Etam plc v Rowan [1989] IRLR 150
R (Amicus) v SS for Trade and Industry [2004] EWHC 860
Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97
Kreil v Germany (2000) C-285/98
Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality [1990] ICR 768
Tottenham Green Nursery v Marshall (No 2) [1991] ICR 320
Kontofunktionaerernes Forbund v Danfoss (1989) C-109/88
Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (2003) C-187/00
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (2004) C-256/01

Notes