Biconditional introduction

Inference in propositional logic
Biconditional introduction
TypeRule of inference
FieldPropositional calculus
StatementIf P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} is true, and if Q P {\displaystyle Q\to P} is true, then one may infer that P Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} is true.
Symbolic statement P Q , Q P P Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,Q\to P}{\therefore P\leftrightarrow Q}}}
Transformation rules
Propositional calculus
Rules of inference
  • Implication introduction / elimination (modus ponens)
  • Biconditional introduction / elimination
  • Conjunction introduction / elimination
  • Disjunction introduction / elimination
  • Disjunctive / hypothetical syllogism
  • Constructive / destructive dilemma
  • Absorption / modus tollens / modus ponendo tollens
  • Negation introduction
Rules of replacement
  • Associativity
  • Commutativity
  • Distributivity
  • Double negation
  • De Morgan's laws
  • Transposition
  • Material implication
  • Exportation
  • Tautology
Predicate logic
Rules of inference
  • Universal generalization / instantiation
  • Existential generalization / instantiation

In propositional logic, biconditional introduction[1][2][3] is a valid rule of inference. It allows for one to infer a biconditional from two conditional statements. The rule makes it possible to introduce a biconditional statement into a logical proof. If P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} is true, and if Q P {\displaystyle Q\to P} is true, then one may infer that P Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} is true. For example, from the statements "if I'm breathing, then I'm alive" and "if I'm alive, then I'm breathing", it can be inferred that "I'm breathing if and only if I'm alive". Biconditional introduction is the converse of biconditional elimination. The rule can be stated formally as:

P Q , Q P P Q {\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,Q\to P}{\therefore P\leftrightarrow Q}}}

where the rule is that wherever instances of " P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} " and " Q P {\displaystyle Q\to P} " appear on lines of a proof, " P Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} " can validly be placed on a subsequent line.

Formal notation

The biconditional introduction rule may be written in sequent notation:

( P Q ) , ( Q P ) ( P Q ) {\displaystyle (P\to Q),(Q\to P)\vdash (P\leftrightarrow Q)}

where {\displaystyle \vdash } is a metalogical symbol meaning that P Q {\displaystyle P\leftrightarrow Q} is a syntactic consequence when P Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} and Q P {\displaystyle Q\to P} are both in a proof;

or as the statement of a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

( ( P Q ) ( Q P ) ) ( P Q ) {\displaystyle ((P\to Q)\land (Q\to P))\to (P\leftrightarrow Q)}

where P {\displaystyle P} , and Q {\displaystyle Q} are propositions expressed in some formal system.

References

  1. ^ Hurley
  2. ^ Moore and Parker
  3. ^ Copi and Cohen